Posted on Leave a comment

A bit of a biography

an avatar in the style of a Mattise portrait

I never set out to be an artist

I started taking photographs when I was about 18, and more seriously when I was at University. The idea of being an artist never entered my head, however. I wanted to be an engineer. However, a long stay in hospital when I was 17 led to me repeating a school year. I soon realised it wasn’t really for me. Without much direction, I cast around, looking at all sorts of subjects, from Cybernetics at Loughborough University to Industrial Design at Hornsey College of Art, North London.

A chance encounter with a book about architecture and urban design, by Theo Crosby, brought me to planning. My A-levels were still Chemistry, Physics and Maths though, and I had largely lost interest, so my final grades were poor. Somehow I managed to get a place at Birmingham College of Art, studying planning, but had no contact with the rest of the College. My degree when it came was, for complicated reasons, a B.Sc. granted by the University of Aston.

Discoveries

My involvement in art as art was random. I became aware of Victor Pasmore via a visit to a housing development he designed in Peterlee, Co. Durham, where in 1955 he had appointed Consulting Director of Architectural Design for the development corporation. Paul Klee and Joan Miró came to my notice via the covers of Penguin science fiction books in the 1960s. I don’t recall how I discovered Kurt Schwitters. Many years later, I discovered that Schwitters’ sponsor to come to the UK as a refugee, was also my family doctor when I was very young! In the early 1970s I was a constant visitor to the V&A, exploring the galleries from sculpture to musical instruments.

By Andrew Curtis, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=14430134

In the 1980s, I worked with Northern Arts on the early days of Gateshead’s public art programme. That’s when I became aware of the work of land artists like Andy Goldsworthy and Richard Long. I also assisted on a course for teachers on Art and the Built Environment. Later, in Wiltshire, I helped organise a conference on the same topic. My focus, if I had one, was I think on creativity in general, not in any particular art form. Something was gelling, though, because in the late 80s, I enrolled on an ‘A’ level in Art. I had no intention of taking the exam, I just wanted to ‘do it’, but my move to Wiltshire ended it anyway.

From here: http://www.picturesofgateshead.co.uk/works_of_art/index.html

From digital to ‘inky fingers’

Around the time I turned 50, I started scanning in some of my old transparencies, only to discover that many had succumbed to fungal growth and peeling emulsion. Trying to restore them involved, in some cases, the recreation of large parts of the image. At some point, I realised that the work I was doing as restoration could be done in its own right and began making and selling what I called, at different times, digital paintings and digital prints. I also took various short art courses and started going to art exhibitions more regularly.

In about 2008, another chance opportunity led to a tour of 107 Print Studios, in Wiltshire, where I saw work in progress by Gillian Ayres and Howard Hodgkin. I was hooked, and within a week had enrolled on a print workshop at Wiltshire College in Trowbridge. Later, a group of us on that workshop began organising our own shows and selling events until the Pandemic, which also closed the workshop. That was,, I think, when I first started seeing myself as an artist.

  • imaginary landscape abstract monotype print
  • Shalimar - monotype in blues and greys
  • abstract monotype print blue, red and orange inspired by science fiction
  • abstract monotype print inspired by Bert Irvin - red, green blue
  • gelprint 30cm x 30cm abstract print in reds and yellowell

If I have a ‘philosophy’, it is simply a belief that certain arrangements of colour and shape are intrinsically harmonious. I like abstract art so that is what I focus on, although landscape is never far away. I work intuitively, putting down colour on the plate, taking an impression and reacting to what I see, repeating until the picture says stop. There are several posts about my process on the blog. The link is to just one.

Digital again

During a period when further health issues stopped me working in the studio, I went back to working digitally. Originally I had used photographs as source material, but this time around I used colour separations generated from the scanned images of my monotypes. The digital process allowed me to create variations on the monotypes without destroying their uniqueness by printing straight reproductions.

I had been considering making screen prints, but in my brief foray in the past I found it very fatiguing. So, when around this time I came across a reference to Risograph printing, it seemed the way forward. This was confirmed when I saw work in Pressing Matters magazine. I did a workshop with 16Tonne Press near Bristol and following that produced a trial edition of four small prints, which worked out well. I’m now planning the next and much larger print.

Insert Risograph scans here

There is more I can do with gel printing, I’m sure, and I am developing some other ideas around assemblage and artist books, which may give me a vehicle for incorporating another love of mine, the artwork found in vintage SF magazine of the 40s and 50s.

Posted on Leave a comment

Games without rules

© The Trustees of the British Museum. Shared under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence.

A work in progress

I have been mulling over an idea for some months now. It is so different from anything else I’ve done in the past that I have no reference points against which I can judge its worth, which is why I’m posting it here as a ‘work in progress.’ It combines elements of an art installation, with assemblage. I finally began thinking in more detail after reading this and came across this question.

Is a game that cannot be played, because there are no known rules, really a game, or just an ornamental block of wood? (paraphrased from the original)

Many commercial board games have fairly ancient origins. Ludo for example has roots in India, in the sixth century CE. The original was played for generations and so survived to be commercialised. For many games, though, we have boards and pieces, but no rules. In some cases, academics rules have partially reconstructed the rules from paintings or illustrations, but not without a great many assumptions. The link above mentions The Royal Game of Ur but a similar example is the ancient Egyptian game, Senet.

© The Trustees of the British Museum. Shared under a Creative Commons

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence.

Research revealed a treasure trove of interesting games, some almost lost, others played in various forms across huge swathes of the globe, yet largely unknown outside those areas. It seems likely that many others were only ever played on game boards scratched in the earth or on pieces of fabric, long since decayed. The Korean game Yunnori or Yutnori, for example is traditionally played on a fabric game board. There must have been others. I wondered, too, about the cup and ring marks found on rocks across the North of England. These already turn up as motifs in my prints. Are they perhaps a remnant of some lost game?

Cup and Ring marks, Lowdenshaws Northumberland

Games as installation

This led me to the idea of creating an installation of game boards and playing pieces, but leaving the rules unstated. I haven’t started making them yet, but I’ve set out a couple of ideas below. I’m still thinking about the approach I might take when making the boards and pieces. My first thought was to treat it as a recreation, and use materials that would have been available across most of history. Alternatively, I could use create modern interpretations using materials such as acrylic sheet. It seems to me that the two approaches raise different questions about the nature of play and competition.

Game’ 1

Board:

Rectangular, made up of 36 squares in three rows, 12 squares in each row coloured as shown

  • Row 1: Red and White
  • Row 2: Green and Red
  • Row 3: Green and White.

Game tokens:

  • Two sets of 9 pawn type figures in contrasting colours
  • Three individual pieces, 1 red, 1 green, 1 yellow
  • Five flat casting sticks, one side marked.

Notes:

The board is derived from that used in Senet, but I chose the colours and game tokens to suggest, without defining them, other modes of play. I have described the pieces as pawns, but they could equally be stones or pebbles. The individual pieces could be larger stones, perhaps decorated.

Game’ 2

Board:

Chequerboard 8×8 in Red, Black, White and Yellow with overlaid symbols on one square in each quadrant.

Game tokens:

  • 12 white, 4 black, 1 black and gold.
  • 2 D20 die with numbers,
  • 1 D6 die with numbers.

Notes:

The chequerboard pattern is common, but the colours and the uneven distribution of the pieces suggest a different form of play, as does the division into quadrants and the symbols in each quadrant.

Die of all sorts from D3 upwards are widely available. The casting sticks I mentioned above are effectively D2. Modern die come in a range of materials, ranging from acrylic to ‘antiqued’ finish. I assumed, that other than D6, they were largely modern inventions, but that isn’t the case. Apparently 20-sided dice (icosahedrons) date back to Ptolemaic Egypt, around the 2nd century BCE. They were often inscribed with Greek letters and may have been used for divination or gaming. The Romans used both tali (four-sided) and tesserae (six-sided), while Knucklebones, which were used in ancient Greece and probably long afterwards, had four usable sides and were precursors to modern d4 dice. The modern polyhedral set (d4, d6, d8, d10, d12, d20) were apparently standardized in the 1970s with the rise of tabletop role-playing games like Dungeons & Dragons.

http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/551072

I imagined the game board as made from a cradled wooden panel or a repurposed chess/draughts board. If it is made using a panel, this could possibly double up as a box with the game pieces stored in the back, perhaps in a draw string bag or bags, with a lid made from wood/mdf or acrylic.

Posted on Leave a comment

Artist Led Gallery in Wilton

I’m pleased to be taking part in a new, artist led, pop-up gallery in Wilton, Wiltshire. The Ground Gallery is based in what used to be the Wilton Carpet Factory. The buildings were regenerated to become Wilton Shopping Village, and is now undergoing further refurbishment as The Guild. There will be a mixture of independent and national brands ranging from carpets, shoes, interiors, lifestyle and beauty, as well as serviced office space. Ground Gallery was originally a conventional, commercial gallery, but for a variety of reasons the owners handed it over to the exhibiting artists to manage. Since then, some have left and others stepped up to replace them, including me.

We have painters, jewellers, textile artists, ceramicists, glass artist and other makers. I’m the only printmaker so far. At least two of us are also writers.

I’m concentrating on showing current work, although I do have a bargains box, with a range of older digital pieces, which I would rather see on someone’s wall than lying around in my spare room gathering dust.

The detailed images include a new edition of Risograph prints, available in the gallery, both framed and unframed. I aim to add them to the shop as soon as possible.

The gallery is open 11.00 am to 3.00 pm Thursday to Sunday. Most weeks it is open on at least one other day, and is often open for longer hours too. I’m there next on 15th August and every other Friday after that. If you are in the area, pop in for a chat.

Give me this code AXFP and get 10% of all orders over £25.00.

This code only applies on the days I am in.

Posted on Leave a comment

Site Update

a matter of detail - abstract print exploringharmony and balance

I haven’t been very mobile for several months, so my studio time has been severely curtailed. I’m improving and hope to get back before Christmas. The forced downtime has left me frustrated and with lots of tiny sketches and notes. I hope they will still mean something by the time I try to use them. In the meantime, I’m trying to make some improvements to the site. I’m unhappy with a few aspects of the site layout, and I want to improve the presentation of my work by bringing it to the forefront. I’ll try not to break anything as I tinker, but if something isn’t working as it should, please be patient. It would be very helpful if you could also email me with details of the problem. You can also comment on this post, or even send me a message via Instagram.

Posted on Leave a comment

Exhibitions and sales

Blue Tango - digital print of two tango dancers entwined in a classic tango position

I currently have two prints selected for two different shows. On top of that, I’ve just sold three prints via a small village show, including ‘Blue Tango’ above, which was quite something. It’s the most I’ve sold at one time in ages. So, don’t ignore similar opportunities in your area. They usually benefit a local good cause, too.

This below is in the Bath Society of Artists Open Exhibition at the Victoria Art Gallery in Bath. These are always worth visiting if you are in the area. I’m very pleased to be in such good company.

The second will be in a show at the Devizes Museum. This one, ‘Sarsen Stones’, is a collagraph on a hand made paper. The show is only held every other year and attracts submissions from a wide area. This is only my second submission to this show, so again I’m pleased to be included.

A collagraph print of simplified sarsen stones on handmade paper in an edition of 5.

Finally, tomorrow I’m off to see an exhibition of work by American artist (although UK based) Felice Hodges at the Vanner Gallery, in Salisbury. I’ve seen the images on the gallery website, and I’m looking forward to seeing them in reality. I’ve always enjoyed the shows I’ve seen there before, and I don’t expect this one to be an exception.

Posted on Leave a comment

Playing with digital images again

Photographs of the iconic 'Get Carter' car park in Gateshead, before demolition

I came into printmaking via digital images and still use digital tools, for example to make stencils, as I have described in various posts here. When I can’t get into my studio, whether lack of time, or more recently health issues again, I also like to play with my software of choice, Paint Shop Pro, to make digital prints. These may or may not end up n the shop, my main reason for making them is simply to keep my creative eye in practice.

These are two of the latest such prints, both monochromatic, both and made from some old photos of mine of the now demolished ‘Get Carter’ shopping centre in Gateshead. The main image is one of the source files. It was pretty much abandoned when I took them, and I was vaguely aiming for the same grey dystopic feel. The first of these seems to capture that feeling quite well.

Digital print entitled Dystopia, with grainy indistinct buildings in the background and on the left a sigh saying PARKIN without the G, aligned vertically
Dystopia 1

Working on the second digital image, however, it decided to take a different path. Instead of a brutalist buildings, I saw not architecture but some sort of engineering structure, floating in space. This may have come via the TV series, ‘The Expanse’. Then I noticed a round white shape with what looked a bit like an outstretched arm, and out of that came the title, ‘Space Walk’. I’ve added a detail below in case I’m seeing things…

Digital image showing what appears to be a tangle of engineering structures in a harsh light against a dark, star-studded background with a figure in what looks like a white space suit clinging to the structure about halfway down on the left
Space Walk
detail from the previous image showing the apparent figure with helmet and outstretched arm
Space walk – detail

I love the smoky, grainy aspect of both these digital images and think they would work well as photopolymer etchings. That’s certainly something I intend to try.

Posted on 1 Comment

Gallery visit – Eleanor Bartlett at the Vanner Gallery in Salisbury

After a series of recent health issues, It was sheer delight to get out and about. I chose to see this exhibition of work by Eleanor Bartlett. I had seen one piece by her before, also at the Vanner Gallery. It was by far and away the best in that show.

She paints using very utilitarian materials, metal paint and bitumen from hardware stores. The work, though, transcends the hum drum nature of the materials. The large paintings have an overpowering presence which dominates their surroundings. Even the smaller one have a physicality which transforms them from 2D painting to sculptural objects. I’ve quoted Terry Frost before, “To look at a painting which gives you the opportunity to have solitude, to be yourself and to be able to wander into reverie, is more than hedonistic, it’s spiritual” and these works have that same quality. They have a depth into which one can fall. They also seem to have a history, with a sense of millennia of accretion and erosion, all leading to the object before the eye.

Eleanor Bartlett Untitled 2022

I was also intrigued to hear, talking to David Christie, the gallery director, that Eleanor Bartlett holds a similar view to mine about the meaning of abstract work. I missed the artist talk, but she refuses to talk about meaning – ‘it has no meaning’. The composer John Cage apparently said, in a talk, “I have nothing to say, and I’m saying it”, cited by Gerhard Richter in the context of his ‘Cage’ series. I’m obviously in good company.

Unfortunately, you don’t have long to see the show – it closes on Saturday. I’m sorry I didn’t make it earlier, if only so that I could have gone again. If you can make it to Salisbury in time, I recommend you make the effort.

Posted on 3 Comments

Why is it art?

a wall painting at lascaux cave

Since the cave paintings at Lascaux and similar locations were painted before concepts of composition were even thought of, are they art?

Some time ago, in a Facebook group, someone asked this good question.

My initial answer was as below.

I doubt if the people making them saw them as ‘art’. That’s imposing our view of the world on the makers. From our perspective, though, yes they are art. Plus, places like Lascaux were painted by numerous hands, perhaps over centuries. They are not single compositions. What they show though is considered mark making towards an idea.

I suspect the principles they were following were more in the line of magical thinking than aesthetics. They may have thought, “if I paint this animal being killed, we will be successful on our next hunt.” Another possibility is that it was an offering to the spirit world, giving thanks for a successful hunt. Both these have been found in modern times by anthropologists. Whatever it was, they seem to have had something guiding them. They were not just throwing pigment around at random.

Sadly, the discussion didn’t progress much. The rest of this post is based on the argument I was trying to make. It includes a few extra points that didn’t occur to me at the time.

I now think the original question was based on a false premise. We don’t know if they had ideas about composition. We do know that they are not random daubs on a wall. They represent a significant human achievement, only possible because of a great deal of effort and time. They meant something to their makers.

We can never know the motives of the makers or the guiding principles they were working under. We can only speculate. Our speculations cannot fail to be coloured by our own world view, as was the original questioner.

The question of what was in the minds of the original makers of these paintings is a different question to whether they are ‘art.’ We don’t even know if the makers had a concept of art as an endeavour in its own right. There seems to have been an urge to decorate, shown in other finds from many similar cultures, but we still don’t know why it was done.

If we shift our viewpoint from looking at cave paintings to looking at scientific illustrations, it is perhaps clearer. Hooke made incredibly detailed and brilliantly executed drawings of what he saw in his microscope. These are hugely valuable in terms of their scientific intent. To see them as art means looking at them from the perspective of a separate set of values to those of the original maker. The one doesn’t negate the other. Both reference frameworks can apply simultaneously.

In the end, I suspect defining art is like defining a game. After all, what links tennis, golf, poker and Resident Evil? All games, but we would find it hard to describe the common characteristic. So in my view art includes Lascaux cave paintings, Neolithic rock carving, Medieval illuminated manuscripts, Rembrandt, Monet, Malevich, Hockney, Basquiat, and David Bailey.

Hooke is close enough in time for us to have some idea of his thought processes. I think we can feel reasonably confident that he had a sense of his work as having an aesthetic value beyond being a ‘just’ a scientific illustration. We can’t know whether the creators of cave paintings had ideas or concepts of composition, or what they were thinking. We can be sure, though, that they were thinking…

This post is related to several others about meaning in art.

Neolithic art has also provided inspiration for many of my own prints.

Mixed media print - monotype and pastel
Rocking in Rhythm #1 mixed media pastel over monoprint
Collagraph print inspired by neolithic rock carvings
Hammer marks on Weardale
Posted on Leave a comment

Asemic Writing

Some time ago, I linked to this wonderful video, featuring an artist book ‘Hushed Writing’ or Grafia Callada, by Spanish graphic designer and artist, Pepe Gimeno. I make no apologies for showing it again.

Since then, I have come across the work of the US artist Cecil Touchon, in particular his asemic writing. Some of Touchon’s work involves fragmentary text which he arranges into collage, often then painting the image. I’ve touched on the idea of fragmented text in this post on making stencils, but I confess I hadn’t thought of taking that idea further. It is the earlier work in which he transforms found texts by overwriting that seems to have strong affinities with Gimeno. They both produce pieces which have the structure and appearance of text, but without content.

Asemic writing is not the exclusive domain of Touchon. Indeed the roots, seem to go back to c800 CE and the Tang Dynasty. Since then, the Middle Ages and Renaissance saw the use of Pseudo-Kufic (imitation Arabic script) decoration. In the 20th century, many artists including Kandinsky and Man Ray have experimented with it. In many ways, the pictographs of Adolf Gottlieb fall into this genre too. The abstract expressionist scribbles which appear in much contemporary art are surely also descended from this idea. However, in its approach, Grafia Callada, from Gimeno seems to remain unique.

Posted on Leave a comment

Meditation

Minimalist Collage

Some time ago, I can’t remember how, I came across a reference to this book. The images intrigued me, since they seemed to have so much in common with 20th century abstraction, despite their origins in 17th century Rajasthan as aids to meditation.

Book cover Tantra Song

Paradoxically, the strongest visual affinity seemed to be with minimalism. Compare, for example, ‘Tremolo’ by Agnes Martin from 1962 (on the left) with this piece from the book.

The paradox stems from the symbolism of the Tantric paintings when compared with the aim of the minimalists to remove the self. To quote another minimalist, Sol de Witt, ‘what you see is what you see.’

Mark Rothko, not a minimalist, described the myths of antiquity as “the eternal symbols upon which we must fall back to express basic psychological ideas.” This ties in very strongly with the work of an avowedly spiritual artist, Bill Moore. That isn’t surprising since he was an ordained Roman Catholic Priest.

“I often use cruciform shapes,” he says. “But, like Antoni Tàpies, I believe that the power of the cross goes far beyond its use in a Christian context. We’re drawn to what I call essential shapes, patterns and textures. They’re found in all kinds of civilizations and traditions. In fact, the geometric ratios that I use almost subconsciously are the same as those used in ancient Indian, Egyptian and Greek architecture, as well as medieval European cathedrals.”

https://frbillmoore.com/

The Tantric images seem to be made on similar terms. The symbols used have meaning for the devotees, although according to Jamme, these are not fixed. The images are the prop for meditation, beginning with whatever the image ‘means’. This expands and shifts as the mind explores itself.

This seems similar to the use of the Stations of the Cross in Christianity. While the images at each station can be quite elaborate, they can be reduced simply to a Roman numeral. It is the meditation on the meaning of each station that matters.

Another painter, Sir Terry Frost, (here) said: “To look at a painting which gives you the opportunity to have solitude, to be yourself and to be able to wander into reverie, is more than hedonistic, it’s spiritual”.

Until I came across that quote, I had never ‘got’ the work of Mark Rothko. I loved his way with paint, but the paintings themselves seemed shallow. Somehow it managed to pin down for me their essentially meditative nature. Which leads me back to the man himself:

“Art to me is an anecdote of the spirit, and the only means of making concrete the purpose of its varied quickness and stillness.

However, despite all this, the artist who first sprang to mind when I looked at the Tantra paintings, was Robert Motherwell. More specifically, it was the collage in this small catalogue from a show of his work in 2013.

(See also here)

Cover to Robert Motherwell Collage, published by Bernard Jacobson Gallery

I think it was probably the simplicity of these pieces which made me draw the parallels. They transcend their commonplace, everyday origins, encouraging a similar meditative response as the Tantra paintings.

When I discovered it, the quote, from Terry Frost, gave me a focus for thinking about my own work. Until then, I think I always had, at the back of my mind, the guilty feeling that I was just making patterns. Understanding that others can find meaning in something, even if I don’t embed it there myself, liberated me. I realised that there is no meaning in abstract art. It does not require understanding. It just is. An artist may mentally attach meanings to the shapes and colours of their work, but even if they explicitly share those meanings, there can be no guarantee others will discover them or see the same things.

In the end, all art has the potential to be a subject for meditation. Even the flight of the eye across an image, is a form of meditation, a form of reverie. That is as it should be, I think. Art without emotion, seems an empty exercise.

Some images from Tantra Song

Further Reading

Tantra Song

The Atlantic

The Paris Review

Hyperallergic

Robert Leeming

Bill Moore

Modernist Missionary

Stations of the Cross

My Last Art Beats (video)

Robert Motherwell

Robert Motherwell, abstraction and philosophy

Robert Motherwell, early collages

Agnes Martin

MoMA biography

Abstract Minimalism

Terry Frost

Tate Bio